Should I Cut A Hole in Base Drum
#1
Posted 01 November 2011 - 05:50 AM
#2
Posted 01 November 2011 - 06:16 AM
cwailes, on 01 November 2011 - 05:50 AM, said:
It depends on the sound and feel you want. I don't put a hole in my head and I only use felt strips for muffling. I love the sound and feel that produces.
If you have the chance, you should try both to see which you prefer, even if that means playing someone else's kit with a different configuration.
#3
Posted 07 November 2011 - 11:50 AM
This post has been edited by SpamBot: 07 November 2011 - 11:51 AM
#4
Posted 07 November 2011 - 04:17 PM
This post has been edited by FourPieceMetal: 07 November 2011 - 04:18 PM
The Lesson: Don't believe everything you hear from somebody, especially when their conduct disproves it.
#5
Posted 07 November 2011 - 04:44 PM
#6
Posted 09 November 2011 - 11:01 AM
#7
Posted 09 November 2011 - 09:14 PM
#8
Posted 09 November 2011 - 10:44 PM
JBoom, on 09 November 2011 - 09:14 PM, said:
Probably not. I'm on your side with this.
I have heard or read every reason for cutting holes in the BD head, and, like putting pillows or whatever in the drum, all I see is a inability to tune a BD.
With the equipment available today, they can make a BD sound like a roto tom if they want. So I fail to see the need for a hole for a mic.
I've recorded demos, played small clubs, big clubs, auditoriums, and outdoors. The thought of cutting a hole in my BD was never brought up (I would have said no if it had) and for over 40 years I played with a 24" BD, using just felt strips for muffling.
realscotch aka drummer 1910
#9
Posted 09 November 2011 - 11:02 PM
The biggest thing it does sound wise is cut the sustain short (more so then felt strips, less so then stuffing pillows in the kick). It also makes it a bit louder, and it makes sound guys happier to have somewhere to put the mic.
On bones of democracy they yearn to gnaw
Every morsel of fact washed away in the flood
Of innocent tears and innocent blood
#10
Posted 10 November 2011 - 12:12 AM
realscotch aka drummer 1910
#11
Posted 10 November 2011 - 06:57 AM
abacacus, on 09 November 2011 - 11:02 PM, said:
The biggest thing it does sound wise is cut the sustain short (more so then felt strips, less so then stuffing pillows in the kick). It also makes it a bit louder, and it makes sound guys happier to have somewhere to put the mic.
I understand personal preference. I prefer no hole but certainly respect anyone who prefers a hole. But I love the sound and feel of a bass tuned only with felt strips. I'm just not a thud guy.
Which is why I ask the mic question. I honestly want to know if there is some advantage I'm missing out on?
#12
Posted 10 November 2011 - 08:46 AM
JBoom, on 10 November 2011 - 06:57 AM, said:
Which is why I ask the mic question. I honestly want to know if there is some advantage I'm missing out on?
No. Some people only think there is.
realscotch aka drummer 1910
#14
Posted 10 November 2011 - 12:30 PM
realscotch, on 10 November 2011 - 12:12 AM, said:
It's not anyone elses problem if you deny the laws of physics...
JBoom, on 10 November 2011 - 06:57 AM, said:
Which is why I ask the mic question. I honestly want to know if there is some advantage I'm missing out on?
If you play a lot of shows with mic'd drums, it speeds up the process of setting up the kick mic (mic goes in the same spot, the hole, every time. No messing around trying to get the best sound). If the sound guy isn't the best, he'll find it easier to get a decent sound (cutting the hole removes the front heads tone from the equation somewhat, or completely depending on the size of the hole). If you're playing unmic'd, the sound will cut through a loud band a bit more.
edit:
Yes, I do defy people to do things a lot... mainly when I know they can't do it
This post has been edited by abacacus: 10 November 2011 - 12:31 PM
On bones of democracy they yearn to gnaw
Every morsel of fact washed away in the flood
Of innocent tears and innocent blood
#15
Posted 10 November 2011 - 12:40 PM
abacacus, on 10 November 2011 - 12:30 PM, said:
Thanks for the info. I appreciated it.
#16
Posted 10 November 2011 - 04:08 PM
A lot of people bought into that, right up to where the guy on u-tube conducted a experiment where he had 3 sets of drums. One with the tom mounted to the BD, one where the tom was mounted with a isolation mount, and one where the tom was mounted either on a rack or a separate stand.
When the "experts" couldn't see the drums, they couldn't tell the difference, and I'm sure that physics came into play on that one too.
"The current reality is that your average drummer is lazy and doesn't know how to tune, and doesn't replace his heads enough."
That's a quote from Sean Lang, who, I would say, has a rough idea of what he's talking about being as he deals with this stuff every day.
I would bet, that in the real world, if you had 2 identical BD's, with the same heads, same pedal, set up in the same room, one with a hole, and one without, and put the "experts" behind them without letting them see the front head, they probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference.
I've been around so many different drummers in my 55 years of playing, some with top of the line kits that sounded like crap (Gatzens is one) to a guy that played in a band that we passed on more than a few occassions, who played on a set of US Mercury drums that sounded great.
What sound men like is a drummer who can tune his drums so that the sound guy doesn't have to bust his butt trying to get a good sound from a set with lousy tuning.
realscotch aka drummer 1910
#17
Posted 10 November 2011 - 04:15 PM
And yes, that is what a *good* sound man always wants. But not all sound men are that great.
On bones of democracy they yearn to gnaw
Every morsel of fact washed away in the flood
Of innocent tears and innocent blood
#18
Posted 10 November 2011 - 04:42 PM
I'm not going to cut a hole in my BD head to prove a meaningless point.
I've got about 10 different beaters laying around. From the old soft felt to the new hard plastic ones with various thickness' of felt or rubber on them. I can get different sounds, soft or loud, resonant or dead just from changing the beaters and the amount of force I use on the pedal and not touching my BD.
realscotch aka drummer 1910
#19
Posted 10 November 2011 - 04:49 PM
On bones of democracy they yearn to gnaw
Every morsel of fact washed away in the flood
Of innocent tears and innocent blood
#20
Posted 10 November 2011 - 05:26 PM
No reso head/no muffling: You only hear the batter head. Is quite resonant. Before anyone types 'What about the SKII?' Remember, I said NO muffling, and that includes built in.
No reso/Muffled: Resonance is virtually non-existent. You don't hear the boom of the head, so much as the 'slap'.
Reso Head/No porthole/No muffling: Heavily resonant, and, depending on the head or head combo, can also be filled with overtones, as well.
Reso Head/WITH Porthole/No muffling: Meets in the middle. Not with as little resonance as a BD WITHOUT a reso, but not as resonant as a BD WITH a porthole-less reso. Also, keep in mind, the closer to the middle the porthole is, the less resonant the head will be.
Reso Head/WITH Porthole/Muffled: Resonance is not gone, but is heavily cut off. Again, the porthole positioning makes a difference on the resonance.
Reso Head/NO Porthole/Muffled: More resonant then a BD with a porthole that's muffled, but not heavily resonant.
THESE are the sound possibilities that you get with un-triggered Bass Drum experimentation. Look through the list, think of which sound you think you'd like most, and try it out.
The Lesson: Don't believe everything you hear from somebody, especially when their conduct disproves it.



















